Repository logo
Communities & Collections
All of DSpace
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Bhalavi, S.B."

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Status of tigers, co-predator and prey in Navegaon Nagzira Tiger Reserve (NNTR) - 2021
    (Maharashtra Forest Department and Wildlife Institute of India, 2022) Habib, Bilal Habib, B., Nigam P., Ramanujam, M., Pate, P., Singh, K., Bhalavi, S. B., Bhandari, A. and Akshay, J. Kanishka; Nigam, P.; Ramanujam, M.; Pate, P.; Singh, K.; Bhalavi, S.B.; Bhandari, A.; Kanishka, Akshay J.
    The Phase IV monitoring for the NNTR core and buffer was conducted from December 2020 – March 2021 as part of the project “Long term Monitoring of Tiger, Co-predator and their Prey in Tiger Reserves and other Tiger Bearing Areas of Vidarbha Maharashtra”. The field site for this exercise was Navegaon-Nagzira Tiger Reserve. The core and buffer areas of the tiger reserve were covered under this exercise. The objective of Phase IV Monitoring is to estimate the minimum number of tigers in the reserve using Capture-Recapture Sampling and density estimation of prey base using Distance Sampling.518 camera traps were placed in the core and buffer area of NNTR following a sampling grid of 2.01 sq. km in two blocks. An average camera trapping survey of 33 days in each block (Nagzira and Navegaon) with a sampling effort of 15,692 trap nights yielded data used for further analysis. Tiger density per 100 km2 based on the Spatially Explicit Capture-Recapture (SECR) model was 0.64 in the Navegaon-Nagzira Tiger Reserve while that of leopards based on the same method was 8.21. To estimate prey density, 172 line-transects were sampled 7 times during the sampling period, with a total walking effort of 2382 km. The individual densities in Nagzira and Navegaon Core for Sambar, Chital, Nilgai, Wild pig, and Gaur were estimated to be 1.26 ± 0.39, 8.89 ± 1.77, 9.14 ± 1.94, 8.27 ± 4.85, 5.50 ± 1.08 and 0.56 ± 0.25, NA, 10.42 ± 2.61, NA, 5.93 ± 1.68 respectively whereas the individual density estimates for Nagzira and Navegaon buffer for Sambar, Chital, Nilgai, Wild pig, and Gaur were 0.15 ± 0.13, 10.29 ± 1.96, 7.13 ± 1.43, 13.92 ± 8.29, NA and 0.49 ± 0.18, 7.61 ± 2.15, 11.75 ± 1.97, 12.03 ± 8.12, NA respectively. To study space use patterns and activity we used camera-trapping data from both core and buffer areas of Navegaon-Nagzira Tiger Reserve. Camera trap locations with the number of captures of each species were modeled in a GIS domain using IDW (Inverse distance weighted) interpolation technique to generate spatially explicit capture surfaces. The times recorded on camera trap photos provide information on the period during the day that a species is most active. Species active at the same periods may interact as predator and prey, or as competitors. Sensors that record active animals (e.g. camera traps) build up a record of the distribution of activity over the day. Records are more frequent when animals are more active and less frequent or absent when animals are inactive. The area under the distribution of records thus contains information on the overall level of activity in a sampled population. Species distribution was mapped seasonally using direct sighting data of wild ungulates from all the three seasons i.e. from winter 2019 to monsoon 2020 that was collected through regular patrolling using the MSTrIPES, a patrolling protocol mandated by NTCA to use in tiger reserves. MaxEnt, ArcGIS software was used for data preparation and final analysis. Factors that influence species distributions and habitat selection are of great importance to researchers and managers of wildlife. Here we used habitat variables namely: Land use Land cover (LULC), Digital Elevation Model (DEM), slope, aspect, stream delineation (Distance to streams), distance to the village, distance to road, distance to the railway line, and distance to the waterhole.

WII Digital Repository, copyright © 2025

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback