Browsing by Author "Ziipoa, Benjamin"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Effects of Land Use Practices on Diversity and Abundance of Honey Bee Forage Plants in Senapati District, Manipur
    (Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 2015) Ziipoa, Benjamin; Rawat, G.S.; Talukdar, G,S.; Gopi, G.V.
    North-east India, a global biodiversity hotspot, ·is also known for diverse socio-cultural and land use practices. One of the important cultural practices in a few pocket-s is bee keeping and honey production as a means of livelihood. However, there is a growing concern that with shortening of shifting cultivation cycle and frequent forest fire the diversity of bee forage plants· as well as honey production is declining in the region. Therefore, a study on the diversity of bee forage plants and bee keeping practices was conducted across various land use practices in Purul subdivision of Manipur, North-east India. The objectives of the study were: (i) To quantify the diversity and abundance bee forage plants in different land use land cover types, (ii) To document the honey bee abundance with respect to forage plant availability, bee keeping practices and traditional knowledge among the local bee keepers pertaining to bee keeping. The study was conducted during December April 2015 in Purul and Paomata subdivision of senapati, district, Manipur. The study area was stratified into five land use and land cover (LULC) types: (i) Semi-evergreen (primary) Forests above 1800 m asl; (ii) Moist Deciduous (Open Mixed) Forests between 1200- 1800 m asl; (iii) Secondary forests (Old Thurn Fallows between 1000 - 170q m; (iv) Secondary scrub (Young Thurn Fallows); and (v) Home Gardens and Agricultural Fields. Six trails of 2 km each were laid in various strata. AIthough each trail ten m radius plots were laid to quantify tree species abundance; concentric 5 m radius plots for shrubs and climbers; and four 0.5 m radius circular plots for herbaceous species. Direct and indirect signs of bee nests and locations of bee boxes were recorded. 30 professional bee keepers were interviewed for their knowledge on bee keeping and bee forage plants. Data were analysed following standard phytosociological techniques. Relationship between bee forage plants and bee abundance were established using R3.02 Generalized Linear Model (GLM). A total of 272 species of bee forage plants belonging to 105 genera and 92 families were recorded in the study area. Of these, 84 species were flowering during winter season. The number of flowering bee forage plants increased to 112 during spring season. It was noted that at least 25 species of flowering plants flower almost during all the seasons providing either nectar or pollens to the bees and other insect pollinators. Asteraceae, Rosaceae, Fabaceae, Brassicaceae and Malvaceae were the most dominant species available as bee forage plants, especially in and ar01md home gardens, backyards and cultivable waste. These species were very low in abundance in natural forests. However, Rosaceae and Fabaceae were more Common in Secondary Forests and Old Jhum Fields. Very few species of bee forage plants were flowering in Semi-evergreen Forests during winter seasons. Highest diversity of trees was recorded in semi-evergreen forests followed by Moist Deciduous Forest, Old Jhum Fallow and Young Jhum Fallow. However, overall density was highest in Moist Deciduous Forest. Budleja asiatica, Rubus ellipticus, Pyrlls pahsia, Engelhardtia spicata, Prunus cerasioides, Docynai india were the most widely available flowering species during winter and spring. These species were mostly found in open (Moist Deciduous), Old Jhum Fallows and closer to human habitation. Their frequency, density and distribution pattern has been compared across various land uses. The results revealed that settled agriculture with adequate cover of primary and secondary forests in vicinity coupled with plenty of ornamental plants and vegetables are best land use practices for honey production as well as enriching the pollinator diversity in the area. Short Jhum cycles and resultant frequent fires are detrimental to bees as well as bee forage plants. Pattern of bee distribution, local knowledge on bee keeping and conservation practices in relation to land use practices have been presented and discussed.