Phinehas N, DavidKher, VarunRobin, V.V.Jha, Ashish2025-01-172024http://192.168.202.180:4000/handle/123456789/247Anthropogenic alteration of habitats is the leading cause for biodiversity loss across the world. To accommodate the ever increasing human population, intensification of urbanised areas have led to the most extreme forms for habitat alteration (Batáry et al., 2018) and imposes a unique set of ecological filters. 2. Over that last 2 centuries during the colonial past, the Nilgiris has witnessed large-scale change in the landscape structure from native shola-grassland matrix to extensive tea and eucalyptus plantations. Currently it has emerged into a tourist haven, attracting millions every year, leading to expansion of the urban cover to accommodate the growing demand. 3. This study illuminates the profound effects of urbanization on bird communities in the Nilgiris, showcasing how habitat transformation alters community parameters such as, species richness, abundance, and composition. My results indicate a stark pattern: as urbanization intensifies, species richness declines, while a select few generalist species thrive in high abundance. 4. My findings reveal that settlements and proximity to remnant shola patches are the primary factors influencing avian community structure. Areas with higher settlement percentages and greater distances from shola patches exhibit reduced species richness and diversity. In contrast, less urbanized areas, closer to natural habitats, maintain higher biodiversity. This aligns with the hypothesis that urban environments simplify habitat structures, creating 'filter' that only a limited number of species can pass through, thereby fostering biotic homogenization. 5. Urban generalists, such as the House Sparrow, Rock Pigeon, and House Crow, flourish in highly urbanized zones due to their ability to exploit the abundant food resources and nesting sites provided by human activities. These species benefit from the homogenized urban landscape, which offers ample opportunities for foraging and nesting, often at the expense of more specialized species. Conversely, endemic shola forest specialists, such as the Nilgiri Laughing thrush and the Black-and-orange Flycatcher, suffer due to their stringent habitat requirements and limited dispersal abilities. These findings highlight the ecological trade-offs imposed by urbanization, where habitat degradation and loss disproportionately impact species with narrow niche widths. 6. This study also highlights the usefulness of citizen science as a tool for collection of largescale data in a short time span. I also tested for the accuracy of the citizen science data against a research-grade benchmark, ie, data collected by me. The results suggest that no significant variations were detected between the two datasets. 7. Conservation Implications: Monitoring species with vulnerable traits to keep track of further degradation of the habitat and involvement of the local citizens is needed. The study highlights a critical need to preserve remaining shola fragments and implementation of biodiversity friendly urban planning.enBirdsHabitat alterationBiodiversity lossAnthropogenic impact on wildlifeEffects of urbanizationShola fragmentsThesis