Technical Reports/Books/Manuals

Permanent URI for this communityhttp://192.168.202.180:4000/handle/123456789/7

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 276
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Monitoring of reintroduced Gaur (Bos gaurus gaurus) in Bandhavgarh Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh Phase II Final report
    (Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 2014) Nigam, Parag; Habib, B.; Nasir, M.; Navaneethan, B.; Sankar, K.
    Bandhavgarh Tiger Reserve (BTR), located between the Vindhyas and the Eastern -- flanks of Satpura hill ranges in the Central India, supported a small population of gaur «40 individuals) till 1995. This population went locally extinct in 1998. Disruption of the migratory corridor between the forest of Bandhavgarh and Ghunghuti and Amarkantak was one of the factors attributed for the local extinction of gaur from Bandhavgarh. Even after the extinction of the gaur from the area, Bandhavgarh provided an excellent habitat for gaur. A proposal for reintroducing Gaur in BTR was initiated by the Madhya Pradesh Forest Department with support of the Wildlife Institute of India (WII) and & Beyond (previously known CC Africa). Gaur were reintroduced in Bandhavgarh form Kanha Tiger Reserve (KTR) in two phases with first batch of 19 individuals during January 2011 and second batch of 31 individuals during March 2012. Of the total of 50 individuals, 27 individuals were fitted with radio collars and monitored continuously. Monitoring of the reintroduced population was facilitated by the WII through a collaborative project titled "Monitoring of Reintroduced Gaur in Bandhavgarh - Phase I (2011-15)" The objectives of Phase I included studying the ranging pattern, habitat use and feeding habits of reintroduced gaur in Bandhavgarh Tiger Reserve and provided newer insight into lesser known aspects of gaur biology, behavior and ecology. The present study (Phase II) was carried out from April 2015 to March 2018, covering all the seasons in a year. The objective of the Phase II were to study the ranging pattern, habitat use, feeding habits, health considerations and competition of reintroduced gaur with other ungulates (Chital, Sambar and Nilgai) and camp elephants. A total of four different gaur herds were identified based on the presence of radio collared individuals and physically identifiable attributes of select individuals to study the ranging pattern of reintroduced gaur. During the study period a total of 1277locations were recorded from identified herds (n=4). During October and November 2017 six individuals (two males and four females) were fitted with collar (TELONICS VHF transmitters) and intensively monitored. The obtained radio-locations were plotted in ArcGIS 10.1. Minimum Convex Polygon (100% MCP) and Fixed Kernel Density (50% & 95% KFD) method were used to calculate home range of different gaur herds along different seasons (summer, monsoon and winter).
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Assessment of wildlife values of the Ganga river from Bijnor to Ballia including Turtle Wildlife Sanctuary, Uttar Pradesh
    (Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 2018) WII
    Freshwater ecosystems, especially riverine systems, give rise to unique habitat mosaics, which support distinctive biodiversity and provide substantial ecosystem services, creating a strong imperative for their protection and restoration. They are being impacted globally by divergent but frequently concurrent processes including water pollution, over-fishing, alteration of natural flow regime, invasive species, climate change and human-induced habitat loss. These dynamic systems are often poorly protected, and require conservation measures through systematic planning. Systematic Conservation Planning (SCP) is widely considered as the most influential paradigm to identify and bring areas under protection through effective planning and spatial prioritization. The SCP requires an evaluation of sites for their biodiversity values, habitat heterogeneity, habitat dynamics, and existing human-induced habitat alteration factors. The Ganga River is the lifeline to more than 500 million people as it flows through five riparian states. It also harbours a unique assemblage of biodiversity due to its passage through three distinct biogeographic zones and unique habitat mosaics. Apart from nurturing umbrella species like the Gangetic river dolphin, otters, gharial and muggel; the Ganga River basin is recognized as a Global Turtle Priority Area and a Turtle Biodiversity Hotspot. With the aim of protecting and consel1'if7g the diverse array of biota and their habitats, a 7 km stretch of the Ganga River between Rajghat (Malviya Bridge) to Ramnagar Fort in Varanasi District, Uttar Pradesh was declared as the Kachhua Vanyajiv Abhyaranya (Turtle Wildlife Sanctuary - TWS). Although declared a protected area, increase in riverbank agriculture, river traffic, water pollution through sewage and solid wastes are posing a threat to the biodiversity of TWS and the river-riparian habitats. High human disturbance in the form of cultural-religious activities are influencing the biological values of TWS. Considering the above, a rapid assessment study (March- July, 2018) was conducted in the TWS to evaluate its efficacy as a protected area; and to identify areas for effective biodiversity conservation. Stretch of the Ganga River between Bijnor to Ballia in Uttar Pradesh was evaluated following Systematic Conservation Planning approach. The objectives of this study were (1) Assessment of habitat structure of TWS and to detect changes over time, (2) Evaluation of efficacy of TWS and adjoining riverscape as a refugia for species of conservation concern; and (3) Prioritization of the Ganga River stretches with mosaics of riverine habitats for conservation planning. A spatial assessment using remote sensing data for the period 1974 to 2016 revealed no significant changes in river channel and sand deposition in the TWS. However, -28% increase in the vegetation cover was observed which could be attributed to the protection accorded to the riparian areas by the Forest Department compared with an expansion of agricultural areas on the landward side. Out of 13 species of turtle reported from Ganga River, only 5 species were encountered during the field sampling with the combined efforts of visual encounter surveys and in-stream sampling using gill nets and box traps within the TWS and upstream and downstream of the Sanctuary limit. Very low encounter rate of turtles in TWS indicates high human disturbance leading to habitat alterations within a very small Protected Area. Sites along the TWS in the left bank are seen to have the least suitable habitat for turtles with high anthropogenic disturbances such as cemented ghats, intense ferry and boat activity, pollution, and human presence along the river. The sand bar in the right bank of the TWS, though is an excellent habitat for turtles and breeding birds, is also under severe anthropogenic pressure. Out of64 species offish reported/rom the Middle Ganga stretch. a total 0/45 species belonging to 38 genera, 16 family and five orders were recorded during the sampling period. The fish catch was higher inside TWS as compared to upstream and downstream o/the sanctuary and this could be attributed to prohibition o/fishing within the Sanctuary limits. A total of28 species of birds were observed, of which four species were of threatened categories as per the IUCN Red List. Nests of breeding birds were not observed from the TWS due to high biotic disturbance. A nesting site of the Indian Skimmer was identified at approximately 6 km upstream of the Sanctuary. Five pairs of Indian Skimmer and 14 pairs of Little tern, 4 pairs of River Lapwing a Near Threatened Species were observed/rom the vicinity. A rapid assessment of wildlife values was conducted in the entire stretch of the Ganga River falling within Uttar Pradesh and priority areas were identified through a scoring matrix. Kruskal's Multidimensional Scale analysis described the habitat parameters that influence species distribution. These parameters were sand mining, channel depth. fishing activities, presence of village/town and riverbed agriculture. Channel depth is the only factor which is positively influencing species distribution. Based on the scoring matrix, the highest biological value was attributed to a river stretch within the Hastinapur Wildlife Sanctuary, followed by the stretch from Brijghat to Narora, which is notified Ramsar Site. In addition to these, moderate biological value was assigned to the stretch downstream of Newada till Ballia. Habitat characteristic score (channel depth, meanders and river islands) was high in the downstream of Allahabad, till Ballia as this stretch persistently maintains high depth classes, meanders and river islands representing a complex mosaic of habitats. The anthropogenic influence scores was almost similar in the entire stretch from Bijnor barrage to Ballia as the river bed agriculture was prominent in the upper stretch. whereas fishing, sand mining, and human settlements were prevalent in the lower stretch of the river. The stretch between Hastinapur Wildlife Sanctuary and Narora already enjoys the protected area status. In spite of the protected status, TWS scored low due to its small size and high human disturbance. Based on the combined scores, a 140 Ian stretch downstream Newada in Allahabad district to Adalpur in Mirzapur district has been considered as the priority stretch for conservation. It is suggested that this area may be brought under the purview of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 by declaring it as a wildlife sanctuary for the conservation of aquatic biodiversity of the Ganga River in Uttar Pradesh. Since the ecological characteristics and wildlife values vary along this 140 Ian stretch on account of anthropogenic pressures, harmonization for excluding some areas having high anthropogenic pressures on account of intense cultural-religious uses may be required, and to be done by the Uttar Pradesh Forest Department.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Assessment of aquatic resources of Askot landscape with reference to the human foot Prints - Phase 2
    (Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 2018) Rajpur, V.; Johnson, J.A.; Srivastava, Ajay
    The aim of the report is to give an overview regarding the areas in Askot landscape which are in need for conservation in terms of aquatic habitat. This study is a part of the project Biodiversity Conservation and Rural Livelihood Improvement (BCRLIP) in Askot landscape. This report deals with the assessment of aquatic resources of Askot landscape with reference to human footprints available there. The focus is mainly on the assessment of fish density and people dependency on fishes along with the caused disturbances. People were-highly dependent on stream Rautis which is located at lower altitude of the landscape. Several human disturbances were identified in the landscape which is electrofishing, bleaching, water diversion, dynamiting, regulated water, sand mining, roads, stream crossings and waste discharge. Riparian quality was assessed in the streams of Askot landscape and found out Dhauli coming under the category F which shows low quality because of changes in the habitat. This provides the health and ecological status of all streams. On the basis of indicator criteria two indicator species was narrowed down as Schizothorax richardsonii and Naziritor chelynoides. So habitat requirement for both the species was studied and found out different requirement for substrate as boulders for Schizothorax and sand, silt for Naziritor. Further monitoring protocol is made for managing the Askot landscape in terms of aquatic fauna.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Monitoring of Re-introduced tigers (Panthera tigris tigris) Sariska Tiger Reserve, Rajasthan - Phase II
    (Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 2018) Nigam, Parag; Habib, Bilal; Sankar, K.; Qureshi, Q.; Mandal, D.; Sengupta, D.; Malik, P.K.
    The reintroduction being an intensive process required timely scientific inputs. The Wildlife Institute of India was bestowed with a responsibility of monitoring the reintroduced population with support of the National Tiger Conservation Authority since reintroduction. The animals gradually settled in Sariska, however did not breed for the first four years probably due to high stress levels and lack of inviolate space (Sankar et aI., 2013). High stress levels among the reintroduced tigers was observed due to the prevailing disturbance in Sariska (Bhattacharjee et aI., 2013). The first record of animal breeding was of ST2 in 2012. Village relocation process to create inviolate space for tiger breeding was also initiated simultaneously. A total of 565 Gujjar pastoralist families were relocated from six villages. The reintroduced population was continuously monitored over the years as part of the collaborative initiative between Rajasthan Forest Department, Wildlife Institute of India and National Tiger Conservation Authority. The report of the Phase I (2008-13) and the extended period (2013-15) were duly submitted. The Phase II of the project was initiated in 2015 to primarily study the response of reintroduced tigers and their prey to village relocation efforts and to explore the future population management. The objective of the Phase II were as follows: i. To study the home range and dispersal patterns of the re-introduced tigers and cubs with respect to relocated villages ii. To assess the habitat use by the re-introduced tigers and cubs with respect to relocated villages iii. To study the food habits of the re-introduced tigers iv. To estimate the population of the prey species v. To suggest management recommendations for effective conservation of tigers in the Tiger Reserve The findings of the influence of village relocation on tiger and prey population, and future management scope have been provided in the Annual Progress Report (2015 -16). Findings on the ranging pattern of tigers, factors influencing breeding of tigers, diet, temporal activity, and an update on the age-sex pattern of the tiger population for active population management in Sariska were presented in the annual report (2016 - 17). Here, we summarize our project findings to formulate conservation strategies for long term survival of Sariska's tiger population.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Ecological Reconnaissance and conservation assessment of avifauna in Sahyadri Tiger Reserve
    (Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 2018) Sati, Surabhi; Vishwakarma, Anurag; Singh, Ashutosh; Ben, Clement; Gopi, G.V.
    The Western Ghats have been designated a World Heritage Site by UfiESCO because of their Outstanding Universal Values (OUVs), and they support several threatened plant and animal species. The birds of the Western Ghats have received a great deal of academic and conservation attention because of their endemism and the conservation threats they face. However, SUM MAR Y there is only limited empirical ecological information on the avifauna of Sahyadri Tiger Reserve (STR). Hence, a systematic study of the avifauna 'lias required to fill the existing knowledge gap and for long-term conservation. This study was initiated in collaboration with STR, Maharashtra and Wildlife Institute of India. The study was conducted between October 2015 and February 2018. The area was divided into four major habitat types, namely agriculture land, grassland, shrubland and forest. The aim of the study was to assess the conservation importance of STR with respect to the avifauna by, understanding the diversity, abundance and habitat utilization in relation to the anthropogenic pressure in different seasons (autumn, winter, summer) . Systematic field data were collected using the point count method to determine the distribution and abundance of species. The bird species, number of individuals (male, female and juvenile), habitat variables, vegetation characteristics and disturbance variables were recorded and quantified. The bird abundances and diversities of the different habitat types were compared and related to habitat features. Bird densities were estimated using the distance sampling method. The Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H') was used to determine the species diversity. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to determine the relationship between the bird abundance and the habitat features within habitat types. A total of 218 species of bird belonging to 55 families were recorded during the study. Seven of these are threatened species. The highest number of recorded species (30) was in the family Accipitridae. Seven endemic birds of the Western Ghats were also recorded. We found that there is a significant relation between the bird density and diversity within a habitat type across the three sampling seasons. In autumn, the density ranged from 733. 7 5 ± 63.14 to 485 .91 ±46.01 per Kml. The highest density was recorded in agriculture land and the lowest in forest. In winter the density ranged from 1573.3 ± 90.27 to 519.83 ± 31.43, the highest being in agriculture land and the lowest in forest. In summer the density ranged from 900.59 ± 58.58 to 403.00 ± 39.97, the highest being in shrubland and the lowest in grassland. The study found higher bird densities in autumn and winter in areas with highly intense agriculture activities as human disturbed areas such as agriculture areas provide heterogeneous habitats that attract human-tolerant bird species. It was also observed that during summer, shrubland had the highest density of birds whereas the lowest density was in grassland and agriculture land. In summer the grasslands and agriculture lands were usually dry. Farmers burn field residues, and hence shrubland provided a more open habitat that supports shrubs that provide food and canopy cover for different bird species. Unlike the bird density, the diversity of the avifauna was high in forest in all three seasons. In autumn, the diversity index values ranged from 3.867 to 3.533, and in winter the diversity index values ranged from 3.895 to 3. 551.ln summer the diversity index values ranged from 3. 941 to 3. 258. The diversity was highest in forest and lowest in grassland in all three seasons. We observed unusual flowering of the Dhak, Butea monosperma (Lam.) Taub. (Fabaceae). The flowering time of the species is March-April though sometimes it also flowers in late February and the flowering lasts till early May. Notably, during our of the field surveys, we observed 10 fully grown individuals of B. monosperma in full bloom from mid November to late December in Chandoli National Park and Koyna Wildlife Sanctuary. Through continuous monitoring of these individuals in the tiger reserve t:le confirmed unusual phenological events that have not been reported earlier for this species. The change in phenological events of this species could be attributed to climatic change, irregular drought patterns or genetic factors, albeit further research is needed. The study reveals the relationship between avifauna species richness and habitat patterns and addresses the effects of anthropogenic pressure on avian species richness and its distribution patterns. Also, this study provides evidence that settlement are as can serve as refuges for birds. Therefore, conservation efforts should be directed towards making communities view human-occupied areas as habitats for birds and not as lost habitats. Hence scientific understanding backed by empirical evidence about the process and patterns of avifaunal assemblages in STR can be used to formulate a robust conservation plan for the birds of the reserve.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Evaluating the outstanding universal value of Western Ghats (Sahyadri sub-cluster), UNESCO World Heritage Site for long term monitoring of Ecosystem Services
    (Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 2018) Sharma, Preeti; Nath, Anukul; Joshi, Chitiz; Walawalkar, Surabhi; Ghosh, Sonali; Ben, Clement V,; Mathur, V.B.
    UNESCO recognizes Natural World Heritage Sites as areas representing pre-eminent-spots of biodiversity that must be identified, protected and conserved by global community. These sites are selected for their Outstanding Universal Values based on magnitude of biological and cultural significance. Sahyadri sub-cluster is one such site inscribed as a WorId Heritage Site in July 2012 based on the criteria: a) Most important and significant natural habitats for in-situ conservation b) Represents significant on-going ecological and biological processes Sahyadri sub-cluster is one of the most exciting landscape for biologists for being the oldest mountain chains in the country which were once part of Gondwana land. In addition to its unique geological history, the endemicity in northern Western Ghats is exceptional. There are unexplored habitats in this landscape that still remain cryptic to most of us. Although the Western Ghats lay claim to unique landforms, flora and fauna, the hotspot of biodiversity is under threat due to high development pressure and fragmentation of the habitats.The report is an outcome of one-year project conducted in Northern Western Ghats in Sahyadri landscape to look at the Outstanding Universal Values and conduct a landcape level survey to assess the ecosystem services in the region. The various services provided by the ecosystem were taken into consideration for evaluation ranging from provisioning to regulating to cultural services. The idea was to provide a monitoring protocol to the forest department for long term perpetuation of the OUY in the region.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    World heritage biodiversity programme for India
    (Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 2003) Mathur, V.B.; Krishnaswamy, Jagdish; Singsit, S.; Bawa, Kamajit S.; Ishwar, N.M.; Vanak, Abi Tamim
    India, one of the earliest signatories to the World Heritage Convention has five key Protected Areas currently on UNESCO’s World Heritage List - Kaziranga and Manas in Assam, Keoladeo Ghana in Rajasthan, Sundarbans in West Bengal and Nanda Devi in Uttaranchal. All five sites satisfy the natural heritage criterion ‘contain the most important and significant natural habitats for in-situ conservation of biological diversity, including those containing threatened species of outstanding universal value from the point of view of science and conservation’ (iv) and hence are critical to the preservation of globally Significant biodiversity. A strong potential exists to build and to strengthen the constellation of India’s World Heritage Biodiversity (WHB) sites in ways that are exemplary and beneficial for the larger network of PAs in India and abroad. The World Heritage Convention also offers a unique possibility in India to link nature and culture in innovative ways to promote conservation of species like the tiger and the elephant at a nation-wide scale. India presents the greatest challenge anywhere in the world for integrating conservation and development on a grand scale, and success here could have major implications for other parts of the developing world. The WHB sites symbolize humanity's struggle to conserve the earth's precious biological heritage against its own onslaught of nature. Combined with other Protected Areas such as National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries, WHB sites represent the last stand of the nature and the best hope for humanity to conserve our most precious endowment. India represents a remarkable example of successful efforts to conserve significant amounts of biodiversity against all odds. Despite the presence of more than one billion people, India has managed to place 154,826 km? of its land area under its PA network. Considerable amount of biodiversity also occurs in habitats outside protected areas. Furthermore, protected areas in India are among the best-managed reserves in the developing world. The WHB sites and other Protected Areas in India, however, remain highly vulnerable to degradation. As islands, these areas are surrounded by harsh biophysical landscapes and alienated local communities. The PA management is not fully equipped to deal with the growing threats to the parks. The staff is inadequately trained in the enforcement of laws protecting wildlife. In some cases such as Manas in the northeast, field staff is demoralized, having suffered setbacks due to insurgency and social turmoil in the area. Moreover, the field staff have neither access to good communications nor to facilities for health and education for themselves and their families and the basic infrastructure required for the effective management of the PAs are generally lacking. World Heritage Biodiversity Programme for . At higher levels, the park management has been unable to incorporate concepts of conservation science and wildlife management in developing management plans. Since parks represent habitat islands surrounded by dissimilar habitats with high densities of human populations, changes inside the park due to intrinsic and extrinsic factors are inevitable. However, there is no significant effort to adopt a systems approach to anticipate and predict future changes. Continuous assessment and monitoring of biodiversity are almost non-existent. The "island" status of the World Heritage sites also makes them highly vulnerable to anthropogenic pressures. Although these islands are connected to varying degrees with other natural habitats, there have been no comprehensive efforts to examine the feasibility of establishing habitat connectivity in areas containing the WBH sites. Since the areas surrounding sites are even more vulnerable to human pressures than the WBH sites, it is critical to examine the potential of connection among natural areas wherever these sites are located and to bring these areas under greater protection. A more serious problem is the lack of local community involvement in conservation efforts. Local communities in many cases remain hostile to the idea that the parks cannot be used for their traditional purposes of grazing, fishing, or extraction of fuel wood and non-timber forest products. Wild animals from the parks also pose a danger to their livestock, crops and houses, thus exacerbating the conflict. Thus, local communities perceive conservation legislation as a threat to their livelihoods. Although there are economic benefits from conservation, such as ecotourism, such benefits generally do not accrue to local communities. Protected areas also have a low profile. The civil society in general is not aware of the importance and in some cases even the existence of World Heritage sites. Although the protected areas have a tremendous educational potential, educational institutions hardly ever use world heritage sites for educational purposes. A new initiative funded by the United Nations Foundation (UNF) and United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and coordinated by the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India initially covering four existing and ten proposed World Heritage Cluster Sites in India has been initiated to address the key conservation and management issues within a single new framework. This framework referred to as the ‘World Heritage Biodiversity Programme for India (WHBPI)’ has been developed through a collaborative planning process by the, Wildlife Institute of India (WII) and the Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE). The ten year WHBP' will have two phases of four and six years each. Four of the existing five WHB sites in India namely Kaziranga, Keoladeo, Manas and Nanda Devi National Parks have been included in the WHBPI. programme as it is receiving a similar support from the Asian Development Bank under the ‘Sunderbans Biodiversity Project’. The goal of the WHBPI is to strengthen biodiversity conservation in Protected Areas by \ building replicable models at WHB sites that emphasize law enforcement, promote habitat integrity and connectivity, enhance the role of local communities in Protected Area management, improve the professional, social and political profile of the Protected Area management community and its civil society partners. The specific objectives of WHBP! are to: 1) increase the capacity of the staff to address critical needs in conservation, management and protection of the WHB sites, (2) enable the . park staff to incorporate principal concepts of modem science in management plans, (3) increase the connectivity among natural areas in the vicinity of the WHB sites, (4) enhance the stake and the involvement of local communities in the management and the protection of the parks, (5) raise the profile of the WHB sites in civil society, (6) bring about policy and governance reforms so that the management have the flexibility to address contemporary challenges to the conservation of biodiversity in the parks, and (7) conduct surveys at sites that may be designated as additional World Heritage. Biodiversity cluster sites.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Conservation plan for biodiversity likely to be impacted by Greenfield Jewar International Airport, Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, India
    (Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 2021) WII
    India has emerged as the fastest-growing major economy and is expected to be one of the top three economic powers in the world over the next 10-15 years. India, like other developing countries, is confronted with the dilemma of securing functionality of different ecosystems rang ing from natural to urban habitats alongside the priorities for expanding the transportation infrastructure. Among these, airports are increasing in numbers to cater to the increased demand air travel for effective connectivity across the country. With the growing needs for air travel from New Delhi's Indira Gandhi International (IGI) Airport and visualizing its unsustainability in meeting high traffic demand in the future based on the projection, the Government of India has recently initiated a project to build a new airport called "Greenfield Airport" at Jewar, Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh (U.P.). The proposed airport covering an area of 1334 ha is within New Delhi-National Capital Region (NCR). This would facilitate air travel from the region's entire National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi, 13 districts of the State of Haryana, eight districts of the State of Uttar Pradesh, and two districts of the State of Rajasthan (Anonymous 2019). With this development and very close proximity to the national capital, it is expected to have several large infrastructure development projects in the landscape. For judicious planning, NCR Planning Board (NCRPB) was created in 1985 to plan the development of the region and to enact harmonized policies for the control of land use and development of infrastructure in the region to avoid any haphazard development of the region as well as conservation of natural resources (Anonymous 1985). The NCRPB's Regional Plan 2021 aims to promote economic grow1h and develop the entire NCR as a region of global excellence http://ncrpb.nic.in/regionalplan2021 .html). On the same lines, the NCRPB has also envisagedincreasing the ambit and has the vision to expand and develop further, for which it is working on a new Regional Plan 2041, which is slated to be, completed soon (http://ncrpb.nic.in). For Greenfield Jewar International Airport (GJIA), Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority (YEIDA) was appointed as a nodal agency by the Government of Uttar Pradesh state to execute the land acquisition process and other activities about airport development on behalf of the Directorate of Civil Aviation, Government of U.P. The YEIDA has steered a Techno-economic feasibility study by PricewaterhouseCoopers Private Limited (PwC) and an EIA study by Greenclndia Consulting Private Limited. Based on these studies, YEIDA moved the proposal to the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) for obtaining "Environmental Clearance" and this was deliberated in the 42nd Meeting convened on 10-12 July 2019. To bridge the gaps between the development and conservation of natural resources, YEIDA was asked to conduct a study for the preparation of "Conservation Plan for Birds and Fauna" in consultation with the Wildlife Institute of India (WII) for further consideration. With the followup, a technical proposal titled "Conservation Plan for Biodiversity likely to be impacted by Greenfield Jewar International Airport, Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh" was submitted to YEIDA forconsideration and it was accepted. Subsequently, a Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) was signed between WII and YEIDA for a study of Phase-Ion 30th August 2019 at shradun, India. The scope of the proposed project was as follows: a. Identify the key sources of impacts and the nature of impacts (direct and indirect, long term and short term and irreversible impacts if any associated with the airport) that would help guide the preventive, ameliorative, and restorative strategies to be adopted in the conservation planning. b. Identify the significant biodiversity values represented by rare, endangered and threatened (RET) floral and faunal species belonging to major taxa (hefpetofauna, birds, and mammals) within the zone of influence of the project. 1-0-1' G c. Assess the vulnerability of habitats and landscape features within a 10 km radius to impacts during different phases of the airport development and the likely implications. d. Prepare a conservation plan for rare, endangered, and threatened (RET) faunal species that is based on preventive and restorative measures for impact mitigation. e. Propose the Phase-II plan (Ten Years) for the "Post-Development Monitoring" for the status of RET species. Consequently, the Wildlife Institute of India mobilized a team of researchers, which started collating desktop-based information on the conservation importance of the taxa and habitats (terrestrial and wetlands) available in the landscape surrounding the airport. We also obtained crucial data, information, and shapefile of the proposed airport from YEIDA. participatory approaches in conservation have played a pivotal role during the last four decades to fulfill human and ecological/environmental goals. Realizing this, we organized a day "Consultation Workshop" with the stakeholders and knowledge partners at Gautam Buddha University, Greater Naida, Uttar Pradesh on 1st February 2020. Around 32 participants attended the workshop from Non-Governmental Organization, Nongovernmental Individuals, and officials from the Forest Department, YEIDA,MoEFCC, and others. We shared and discussed our envisaged framework of the planning process forthe preparation of the "Biodiversity Conservation Plan" with the participants. Based on the valuable suggestions received, we finalized our framework and approaches for the preparation conservation plan. Landscape conservation planning for biodiversity requires the integration of natural wildlife habitats at different scales so as consider the dispersal capacity of various taxa. Based on collated information and suggestion received during the workshop, we prepared the final framework of our approach for the collection of field data for the preparation of the "Conservation Plan for Biodiversity" for the GJIA landscape. We also reviewed the areas of conservation importance at the landscape level around the GJIA site. The landscape falls under Upper-Gangetic Plain and is a part of the semi-arid biogeographic zone. Because of these mixed habitat features, the landscape is endowed with rich biodiversity because of numerous wetlands created along the river Yamuna and the presence of various Protected Areas lmportant Bird Areas (PAs/I BAs) such as Sultan pur National Park, Okhla Bird Sanctuary, Surajpur Bird Sanctuary, and Dhanauri wetland, etc. All these habitats are rich in bird faunal diversity (160 to 300 species) and for migratory birds. Additionally, it has a mosaic of scrub habitats within the agriculture landscape and is the home for two key species of conservation importance besides others such as Indian antelope or Blackbuck (Antilope cervicapra) which is Schedule I species of the Wildlife (Protection) Act 1972 and Sarus Crane (Grus antigone). The infrastructure development plan envisaged in the landscape by YEIDA may cause rapid urbanization and land-use changes and may leave its ecological footprint. Thus, it requires the "Cumulative Impact Assessment" (CIA). Therefore. we also consider other areas which may be critical for the biodiversity conservation of this landscape.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Biodiversity assessment with emphasis on select faunal groups in the Hasdeo Arand Coal Field, Chhattisgarh
    (Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 2021) WII
    In India, the coal reserves predominantly occur in the Gondwana sediments of the East Central region in the states of Odisha, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh and parts of West Bengal. The Hasdeo - Arand coal fields comprising of Tara, Parsa, Parsa East & Kente Basan (PEKB), and Kente Extension (collectively known as HACF henceforth in the report) in Chhattisgarh is one of the identified coal-bearing areas. More than 80% of the HACF and the landscape surrounding it is forested. The coal blocks demarcated HACF and the landscape surrounding it mostly occur in the forests. The Ministry of Forests and Climate Change, Government of India under section 2 (ii) of Forest Conservation Act vide F.Bo.8-31/21 O-FC dated 6th July 2011 granted in-principle (Stage I) forest clearance for diversion of 1898.328 hectares of forest land in Parsa East and Kante Besan captive coal block (PEKB coal block) situated in Surguja Forest Division. This approval was given despite the FAC recommending to reject this proposal in FAC meeting dated 23rd June 2011. Subsequently, the Stage II final forest clearance was granted by Government of India vide MoEF&CC's letter no 8-31 /2010/FC dated 15th March 2012. Aggrieved by the clearance granted by the MoEF&CC, an appeal no 73 of 2012 (Sudiep Shrivastava Vs Union of India Ors) was filed in the Hon'ble National Green Tribunal (NGT) principal bench in Delhi. The Hon'ble NGT pronounced its judgement on 24th March, 2014 directing MoEF&CC to seek a fresh advisory from the FAC with emphasis on seeking answers to the following questions: (reproduced from the order) - (i) What type of flora and fauna in terms of bio-diversity and forest cover existed as on the date of the proposal in PEKB Coal Blocks in question. (ii) is/was the PEKB Coal Blocks habitat to endemic or endangered species of flora and fauna. (iii) Whether the migratory route/corridor of any wild animal particularly, elephant passes through the area in question and, if yes, its need. (iv) Whether the area of PEKB Block has that significant conservation/protection value so much so that the area cannot be compromised for coal mining with appropriate conservation/management strategies. (v) What is their opinion about opening the PEKB Coal Blocks for mining as per the sequential mining and reclamation method proposed as well as the efficacy of the translocation of the tree vis-a-vis the gestation period for regeneration of the flora (vi) What is their opinion about the Wildlife Management plan finally prescribed. (vii) What conditions and restriction do they propose on the mining in question, if they favour such mining? The judgement granted liberty to FAC to get expert opinion/specialized knowledge/advice from authoritative sources such as Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education (lCFRE), Dehradun or Wildlife Institute of India (WII). This judgement of the Hon'ble NGT and stage-I clearance granted for prospecting over 1745.883 hectares of forest land of Kente Extension coal block for exploration of coal reserves vide MoEF&CC letter No. F.No 8-46/2017 -FC dated 19th December 2017 impose a condition that a biodiversity assessment study for entire HACF would be conducted by the State Government of Chhattisgarh through ICFRE, Dehradun in consultation with the WII. The condition is reproduced for reference: "(ii) A biodiversity assessment study is to be conducted by the state government through ICFRE, Dehradun in consultation with the Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun for the whole Hasdeo Arand coal field comprising of Tara, Parsa, Parsa East, kante to be funded by M/s Rajashthan Rajya Vidyut ll Page Utpadan Nigam Limited (RRVUNL). The study is to be awarded by the state Government by associating the Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education (ICFRE) Dehradun or Wildlife Institute of India (WII) and integrated wildlife management plan (IWMP) will be prepared and conservation area will be identified and mitigation measures will be recommended by the expert committee. The cost of the study and cost of implementation of the recommendations shall be borne by the Mis Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Limited (RRVUNL). The report will be submitted within two years". The main objectives of the biodiversity assessment that ICFRE and WII would jointly focus include: a. Provide details of flora & fauna with special reference to endemic threatened species reported from the study area b. Describe the habitat for such endemic/threatened species and identify likely threats for conservation c. Details of migratory route corridor critical areas for wildlife species especially umbrella species like elephants and tigers d. Document socio-economic values of the affected area vis-a-vis biodiversity values e. Consult with forest department officials, local communities in HACF and f. Identification of conservation areas within HACF Consequently, the biodiversity assessment focusing on faunal aspects of HACF was carried out by WII with ICFRE as the nodal agency for the overall assessment. The biodiversity assessment focusing on faunal aspects carried out by WII in the HACF and the landscape surrounding it using on-foot sign surveys and camera trap surveys (for mammalian baselineassessment); transect surveys (for avifaunal baseline assessment), ad libitum sampling for Herpetofaunain conjunction with secondary data and information obtained from Chhattisgarh Forest Department andthe village interview surveys established the ecological baseline information on faunal biodiversity. It isenvisaged in the ToR that impact assessment would be done for the Hasdeo-Arand coal fieldcomprising of Parsa, Parsa East & Kente Basan (PEKB), Tara Central and Kente Extension coal blocks. Of the four coal blocks mentioned, only PEKB is currently operational. Therefore, Wil's impact assessment (Chapter-7), mitigation of impacts (Chapter-S) and preparation of biodiversity conservation and management plan (Chapter-g) focuses on PEKB coal block. Nevertheless, landscape-level suggestions for managing wildlife in HACF and the landscape surrounding it have been detailed in the report. Opencast mining and associated developmental activities in forested habitats could potentially affect a variety of taxonomic groups. Nevertheless, measurement of every aspect of biodiversity in forested landscapes that span several hundred squares kilometers of mosaic habitats in a short period of time is seldom easy. In order to overcome this constraint, short-cut approaches that focus on monitoring large mammal populations, which serve as keystone, flagship or umbrella species have been advocated. As biodiversity assessment, impact assessment and mitigation strategies are to be studied at a landscape level, this study emphasized specially on the "umbrella species concept". The umbrella species concept is a globally accepted concept wherein conservation efforts targeted for a well -chosen representative species can confer a protective umbrella to numerous other co-occurring species in the landscape. Asian elephant and tigers serve as umbrella species in the tropical forested landscapes. Both tigers and elephants are long ranging and have specific ecological needs. Understanding the ecological requirements of these species can augur well for all other species found in the landscape.The results of the assessment show that HACF and the landscape surrounding it is rich in fauna. The HACF and landscape surrounding it supports over 25 species of mammals. The mammals of the Order Chiroptera and Rodentia (except for Ratufa indica that is included in the list) were not surveyed as that would require a long term duration and thus, the number of species reported in the assessment is best considered minimal. Among the mammal species recorded the Hasdeo - Arand area, nine species are listed in the Schedule - I, which are accorded the highest level of legal protection under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. Mammalian species diversity includes threatened large carnivores like common leopard, Indian grey wolf, striped hyena, sloth bear, and others that appears to be widely distributed as evidenced by camera trap captures as well as detections during sign surveys. The Hasdeo Arand area is spread across three districts, viz. Surguja, Surajpur and Korba. The Korba district has two Forest Divisions (FD) viz. Korba FD and Katghora FD. The Korba FD had reported occurrence of tigers. The habitat connectivity between HACF along with the landscape surrounding it, and Achanakmar TR, Boramdeo WS and Kanha TR is strong, and may support sporadic tiger dispersal. Elephant occurrence was reported by the Forest Department in 148 out of 647 compartments in HACF and the landscape surrounding it with an area of 363.98 km2 during the period 2018 to 2020. The elephant occurrence is not restricted to any particular area and is spread across the landscape (Map- 21 , page 56). A conservative estimate of about 40 to 50 elephants could use different parts of the landscape at different times of the year. Human-elephant conflict in the form of crop losses and occasional property damage is widespread too. Elephant conservation and management in the landscape hinges on effective conflict resolution strategies by actively engaging with local communities and at the same time enriching the habitat condition for elephants. Chhattisgarh human-elephant conflict situation is a paradox with a relatively low number of elephants «300, which is <1 % of India's wild elephant population) but high levels of HEC with over 60 human lives are lost every year due to conflict (>15% of the reported human deaths due to HEC). In addition to loss of human lives, crop loss and damage to property due to HEC are severe. There is continuous dispersal of elephant herds from the neighbouring states of Jharkhand and Odisha. The study carried out by WII in collaboration with Chhattisgarh Forest Department from the year 2017 onwards clearly highlight that elephants have large home ranges. The forests that elephants currently occur are highly fragmented and degraded due to incompatible land-use. Infrastructure development and mining are further fragmenting the habitats making conflict mitigation a huge challenge. In fragmented habitats conventional fencing approaches minimally work due to high perimeter to area ratio of habitats. The EC region harbours less than 1/10th « 3000) of country's elephants, but loses over 40% (over 200HEC-related deaths) of reported 500 HEC-related human fatalities in the country. The HEC-related human fatalities reported in the region are highly disproportionate to its elephant population in the country. The increasing levels of HEC have resulted in considerable public resentment against the management and elephant conservation as a whole. HEC resolution is challenging in EC region due to fragmentation, loss and degradation of intact elephant habitats. In highly fragmented areas, the elephant home ranges tend to be large as small, degraded forest patches cannot sustain herds. It is observed that home range size is a function of habitat quality - in areas that support good intact habitats, the elephant home ranges are relatively small (eg. Rajaji, Mudumalai etc). However, in fragmented areas, elephant home ranges are typically large. The elephant herds are generally interlinked and home ranges spread over two or more states. One of the main reasons as to why elephants start dispersing into human-use areas is the threat to habitat. In particular, threat to elephant home ranges. While threat to habitat can be identified and sometimes even addressed, threats within individual home ranges of elephants are hard to evaluate and hence, difficult to mitigate. The latter threats are more insidious and lasting. Major disturbances to habitats such as mining not only cause habitat loss and fragmentation (as understood generally) but can affect individual herd's home ranges. Such disturbances can lead to abandonment of habitats as threats to home ranges have a threshold limits. The effect of mining on elephant habitat may not reflect in the same habitat, but could be a silent trigger for HEC in some other area within the landscape. In general, one of the reasons for HEC being disproportionately high in EC region is the elephant dispersal from forest habitats through fragmented human use areas. This large scale elephant dispersal out of intact forests coincide with commencement of large-scale mining projects and associate infrastructure developments in the EC region, particularly in the states of Odisha and Jharkhand. During the biodiversity assessment, a total of 92 species of birds were recorded with in HACF and the landscape surrounding it. The list is best considered minimal. As per the ebird (https:/Iebird.org/) a total of 406 species of birds have been reported in the three districts of Surguja, Surajpur, and Korba - the districts in which the HACF and the landscape surrounding it occurs. It is quite likely that many of the species of birds reported in HACF either use or pass through it. However, it may be noted that HACF and the landscape surrounding it just supports - 12.4% of the combined area (- 15,110 km2) of the three districts. Local communities in HACF and the landscape surrounding it are predominantly tribal. The livelihood of local communities is closely dependent on forest resources. The NTFP collection (of four major commodities) contribute nearly 46% of the monthly income reported by the households. This does not include the fuelwood, fodder, medicinal plants, water and other resources that local communities collect from the forests. If such resources are pooled as income to local communities, it may be conservatively mentioned that over 60 to 70% of the total annual income of local communities come from forest-based resources. Thus, forest dependence substantially adds to income security of local communities. In addition to financial gains, forest produce collection is critical for medicine, food and other health benefits thereby providing food security and overall well-being. The local communities have reported coming across a variety of wildlife in and around their settlements. A few respondents (n = 4) have even sighted tiger in and around their settlements. They expressed concern about human-wildlife conflict involving crop losses, loss of livestock, loss of property and occasional loss of human lives. Garnering the support of local communities for wildlife conservation would be conditional on addressing human-wildlife conflict on a real-time manner. In general, the local communities are apprehensive of mining, which is perceived as a threat to livelihood as the land as well as forests are lost in the process of mining. The community respondents interviewed expressed concern and were anxious over loss of forests (and consequently material base for livelihood) and loss of land due to mining. The loss of forests due to mining is perceived as a direct threat to livelihood by the local communities. The local communities express positivity towards forest conservation and at the same-time insist on timely resolution of human-wildlife conflicts. Conservation initiatives in the landscape need to be participative and actively involve local communities. Considering this, as part of the biodiversity assessment, and as envisaged in the ToR of the study, the impact of the ongoing mine of PEKB in the HACF has been assessed. It may be noted that the impact assessment carried out by WII for PEKB coal block is not a true Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) as PEKB coal block is already operational covering nearly 1000 hectares of the 1898 hectares cleared for mining. Coal extraction is already being done and is in operational stage. Therefore, visualizing the true picture of the likely impacts on the physical environment as well as the wildlife the area supports is not possible. Nevertheless, selected impacts of the physical environment that are likely to impact directly on select biodiversity and social values in the PEKB operation have been identified. For this purpose, the faunal biodiversity list provided by Indian Institute of Forest Management (IIFM) as part of the EIA for PEKB (IIFM, 2009) was used as the baseline for evaluating the impacts. In general, the impact assessment methods argue that the foremost step in impact appraisal must consider and identify project actions that are likely to bring significant changes in the project environment. Such impacts include: physical, biological and social environments. The potential impacts due to ongoing mining operations of PEKB on physical environment, fauna and local communities have been elaborated. The possible mitigation strategies for addressing the impacts of PEKB include progressive restoration, development of grass and leaf fodder plots, livelihood options to increase income sources, bio-filter check dams in the streams of the project sites, green-belt development - phytoremediation, development of "Green Gallery Belt", eco-restoration of waste dump, construction of underpasses, construction of pipe and box culverts as safe passages in the roads as mitigation strategies for reducing road mortality. The detailed mitigation strategies have been provided. The biodiversity conservation and management for PEKB focusing on species groups, threatened plant & animals, resource base of local communities along with the social values have been given. The Human-Elephant conflict mitigation strategies in the HACF and surrounding landscape should include the following: 1. Maintaining the ecological integrity of intact natural habitats without fragmentation and degradation is critical. Any additional mining leading to loss of habitat would escalate HEC unpredictably high 2. Formation of landscape-level Rapid Response Teams by engaging village youth with adequate remuneration is essential. The RRT members should be adequately trained in elephant behaviour and conflict management methods. 3. Judicious use of mobile barriers in select areas of HACF and surrounding landscape where HEC is high need to be experimented with active community participation. 4. Ex gratia payment for crop, property and other losses due to elephants have adequate and timely. The overall process of filing and obtaining compensation by villages should be made smooth and transparent 5. Habitat enrichment by improving surface water availability in carefully selected locations, development of grasslands and fodder base based on the list of plants suggested in the report and protection of critical micro-habitats such as riparian tracts are critical (Refer Table 9.23). 6. Human-elephant conflict is dynamic in nature. The above mentioned mitigation measures need to be experimented in smaller areas and based on the evaluation of efficacy can be scaled up. As certain portions of the PEKB block has already been opened for mining, the miningoperation may only be permitted in the already operational mine of the block. The other areasin HACF and landscape surrounding it should be declared as Uno-go areas" and no mining should be carried out considering the irreplaceable, rich biodiversity and socio cultural values. The HACF and the landscape surrounding it support rich biodiversity with a multitude of mammalianspecies including elephants and also harbours forest-dependent communities. Therefore, sustaining the forest cover and maintaining its overall ecological integrity is essential. It is pertinent that Chhattisgarh Forest Department with due consultation and involvement of local communities identify areas within HACF and the landscape surrounding it for declaration as Conservation Reserve (CR) under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. Under the ambit of a CR, habitat improvement activities such as restoration of grasslands and restoration of degraded forests; improving surface water availability in relatively drier tracts during summer, regulating forest fires, and improving overall protection can benefit biodiversity. 2 The response pertaining to this query shall be provided by ICFRE as it deals with nora and efficacy of translocation of the tree vis-a-vis the gestation period for regeneration of the nora The coal mines along with the associated infrastructure development would result in loss and fragmentation of habitat. Mitigating such effects on wildlife, particularly the animals with large home ranges such as elephants is seldom possible. The human-elephant conflict in the state is already acute and has been escalating with huge social and economic costs on the marginal, indigenous local communities. Any further threat to elephants' intact habitats in this landscape could potentially deflect human-elephant conflict into other newer areas in the state, where conflict mitigation would be impossible for the state to manage. Opening up of coal blocks for minging in the HACF would compromise the imperatives of biodiversity conservation and livelihood of forest-dependent local. Even the effects of the operational PEKB mine need to be tactfully mitigated too, wherever possible. The assessment findings are in conformity with the study undertaken jointly by the Ministry of Coal and Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change across nine coal fields across the country during the year 2009, where it was concluded that the Hasdeo-Arand coal fields in north-central Chhattisgarh is identified as a 'no-go' area. The findings of this joint study of 2009 culminated into an important policy decision towards facilitating an objective, transparent and informed decision regarding forest lands being diverted for coal mining projects. However, the findings of the study were set aside during 2011 . Considering the need to reconcile country's developmental needs with conservation priorities, the recommendations of the 2009 joint study holds substantial importance for ecologically balanced sustainable growth.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Identification of human-leopard hotspot the prioritizing the mitigation measures in Junnar Forest Division, Pune, Maharashtra
    (Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 2020) Habib, B.; Khandekar, V.; Nigam, P.; Mondol, S.; Jayaramegowda, R.; Ghanekar, R.; Kumar, A.
    Mitigation of human-carnivore conflict became a priority to wildlife managers for the conservation of large carnivores and human livelihood. Hence, for the effective mitigation measure, it is necessary to identify the priority human-carnivore conflict hotspots. In India, the growing human population, infrastructure development, and land modification are affecting the large carnivore population leading to human carnivore conflict. Among human-carnivore conflict, human-leopard conflict is common in different geographical regions due to the adaptability of species across a different environmental gradient in India. Human-leopard conflict records of 20 years (1999-2018) were collected from the different ranges of the Junnar Forest Department (JFD) in the Pune district. The area is known for the human-leopard conflict for the past three decades. The records show an abrupt surge of human-leopard conflict after the year 2014. Using these records, spatio-temporal clusters of the hot spots and cold spots were identified using optimized hotspot analysis tool in ArcGIS. Also, five different categories of hot spots in the study area namely, new hot spots, consecutive hot spots and sporadic hot spots of human-leopard conflict through emerging hot spot analysis in ArcGIS were identified. It is suggested that different management approaches and strategies focusing on the different categories of hotspots are required to deal with human-leopard conflict for effective mitigation measures. Villages have been highlighted as the new conflict hotspots i.e. which has emerged in recent years. Immediate actions like intensive night patrolling and awareness in the villages to control will help in reducing human leopard conflict.