WII Technical Reports
Permanent URI for this collectionhttp://192.168.202.180:4000/handle/123456789/314
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Item Status of Tigers, Co-Predator and Prey in Pandharkawada Forest Division (Territorial) 2021(Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Maharashtra Forest Department, 2022) Habib, Bilal Status of Tigers, Co-Predator and Prey in Pandharkawada Forest Division (Territorial) 2021; Ramarao, S.V.; Jagtap, K.P.; Nigam, P.; Koley, S.The Phase IV monitoring for the Pandharkawada Forest Division (Territorial) was conducted from March –April (2021) as part of the project “Long Term Monitoring of Tigers, Co-Predators and Prey species in Vidarbha Landscape, Maharashtra, India”. The exercise aimed to cover an area of 655.336 km2 of the forested area of the entire division. The objective of the Phase IV Monitoring is to estimate the minimum number of tigers in the Pandharkawada Forest Division using Spatially-Explicit-Capture-Recapture Sampling and density estimation of prey species using Line transect based Distance Sampling. 110 pairs of camera traps were placed in the forested area of Pandharkawada Forest Division following a sampling grid of 2 km2 in all four blocks. The camera traps were active for average 30 days in each block yielding a sampling effort 3508 of trap nights of data which is used for further analysis. From the camera trap photographs 11 tigers (unique to Pandharkawada Forest Division) and 10 leopards have been identified. Tiger density per 100 km2 based on the Spatially Explicit Capture-Recapture (SECR) model was 2.356 (SE ± 0.727) in the forest division while that of leopards based on the same method was 2.99 (SE ±1.03). To estimate prey density, 84 line-transects were laid randomly all over the division and were sampled 7 times during the sampling period, with a total walking effort of 1176 km was invested. The observations include chital (Axis axis), nilgai (Boselaphus tragocamelus), chousingha (Tetracerus quadricornis), langur (Semnopithecus sp), wild boar (Sus scrofa), chinkara (Gazella bennetii), Indian hare (Lepus nigricollis) and peafowl (Pavo cristatus). As per the observations, Nilgai (n=278) is the most observed species followed by Wild boar (n=77), Peafowl (n= 54), Indian hare (n=45) and Chital (n=44). The overall prey density of Pandharkawada Forest Division is 10.977 (SE± 1.19). Due to very low observations (n<20) densities of chousingha and chinkara could not be estimated. To study the activity, we used the camera trap images. The times recorded on camera trap photos provide information on the period during the day that a species is most active. Species active at the same periods may interact as predator and prey, or as competitors. Sensors that record active animals (e.g. camera traps) build up a record of the distribution of activity over the day. Records are more frequent when animals are more active and less frequent or absent when animals are inactive. The area under the distribution of records thus contains information on the overall level of activity in a sampled population. We used IDW (Inverted distance weighted) to map the intensive area used by different animal species.Item Status of Tigers, Co-Predator and Prey in Tipeshwar Wildlife Sanctuary 2021(Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Maharashtra Forest Department, 2022) Habib, B.; Nigam, P.; Banerjee, J.; Puranik, S.; Jagtap, K.; Koley, S.Phase IV monitoring for the Tipeshwar Wildlife sanctuary was conducted from March –April (2021) as part of the project “Long Term Monitoring of Tigers, Co-Predators and Prey species in Vidarbha Landscape, Maharashtra, India”. The exercise aimed to cover an area of 148.63 km2 of the entire sanctuary. The objective of Phase IV Monitoring is to estimate the minimum number of tigers in the Tipeshwar WLS using Spatially-Explicit-Capture-Recapture Sampling and density estimation of prey base using Distance Sampling. 62 pairs of camera traps were placed in the forested area of Tipeshwar WLS following a sampling grid of 2 sq. km. in one block. The camera traps were active for 30 days yielding a sampling effort of 2206 trap nights of data which is used for further analysis. Tiger density per 100 km. sq. based on the Spatially Explicit Capture-Recapture (SECR) model was 7.07 (SE ± 0.218) in the sanctuary while that of leopards based on the same method was 3.86 (SE ±0.165). To estimate prey density, 13 line-transects were laid randomly all over the division and were sampled 7 times during the sampling period, with a total walking effort of 182 km was invested. The observations include chital (Axis axis), sambar (Rusa unicolor), nilgai (Boselaphus tragocamelus), chousingha (Tetracerus quadricornis), langur (Semnopithecus sp), wild boar (Sus scrofa), chinkara (Gazella bennetii), Blackbuck (Antilope cervicapra), Indian hare (Lepus nigricollis) and peafowl (Pavo cristatus). As per the observations, Nilgai (n=50) is the most observed species followed by Chital (n=27). The overall prey density of Tipeshwar WLS is 17.82 (SE± 3.81). Due to low number of observations densities of chousingha, chinkara, blackbuck, langur, Indian hare, peafowl, sambar, wild boar could not be estimated. To study the activity, we used the camera trap images. The times recorded on camera trap photos provide information on the period during the day that a species is most active. Species active at the same periods may interact as predator and prey, or as competitors. Sensors that record active animals (e.g. camera traps) build up a record of the distribution of activity over the day. Records are more frequent when animals are more active and less frequent or absent when animals are inactive. The area under the distribution of records thus contains information on the overall level of activity in a sampled population.Item Status of tigers, co-predator and prey in Painganga Wildlife Sanctuary 2021(Maharashtra Forest Department, Wildlife Institute of India, 2022) Habib, Bilal Habib, B., Banerjee, J., Reddy, M. S., Nigam, P., Jagtap, K., Puranik, S. and Koley, S.; Banerjee, J.; Reddy, M.S.; Nigam, P.; Jagtap, K.; Puranik, S.; Koley, S.Phase IV monitoring for the Painganga Wildlife Sanctuary was conducted from February – April 2021 as part of the project “Long Term Monitoring of Tigers, Co-Predators and Prey species in Vidarbha Landscape, Maharashtra, India”. The exercise aimed to cover an area of 399.98 km2 of the entire sanctuary. The objective of Phase IV Monitoring is to estimate the minimum number of tigers in the sanctuary using Spatially-Explicit-Capture-Recapture Sampling and density estimation of prey base using Distance Sampling. 45 pairs of camera traps were placed in the forested area of Painganga Wildlife Sanctuary following a sampling grid of 2 sq. km. in one block. The camera traps were active for 30 days yielding a sampling effort of 1722 trap nights of data which is used for further analysis. The minimum number of tigers and leopards individuals identified are 2 and 10 respectively. Tiger density per 100 sq. km. based on the Spatially Explicit Capture-Recapture (SECR) model could not be estimated due to low sample size while that of leopards based on the same method was 3.86 (SE ±0.165). To estimate prey density, 66 line-transects were laid randomly all over the division and were sampled 7 replicates during the sampling period, with a total walking effort of 924 km. The observations include Chital (Axis axis), Sambar (Rusa unicolor), Nilgai (Boselaphus tragocamelus), Chousingha (Tetracerus quadricornis), Langur (Semnopithecus sp), Wild Boar (Sus scrofa), Chinkara (Gazella bennettii), Blackbuck (Antilope cervicapra), Indian Hare (Lepus nigricollis) and Peafowl (Pavo cristatus). As per the observations, Nilgai (n = 236) is the most observed species followed by Langur, Chital, and Wild Boar. The overall prey density of Painganga WLS is 35.142 (SE ± 4.2723). Due to a low number of observations density estimation was not carried out for Chousingha, Chinkara, Blackbuck, Indian Hare, Peafowl, Sambar. To study the activity, we used the camera trap images. The times recorded on camera trap photos provide information on the period during the day that a species is most active. Species active at the same periods may interact as predator and prey, or as competitors. Sensors that record active animals (e.g. camera traps) build up a record of the distribution of activity over the day. Records are more frequent when animals are more active and less frequent or absent when animals are inactive. The area under the distribution of records thus contains information on the overall level of activity in a sampled population. We used IDW (Inverted distance weighted) to map the intensive area used by different animal species.