WII Technical Reports/Books/Manuals
Permanent URI for this collectionhttp://192.168.202.180:4000/handle/123456789/314
Browse
171 results
Search Results
Item World heritage biodiversity programme for India(Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 2003) Mathur, V.B.; Krishnaswamy, Jagdish; Singsit, S.; Bawa, Kamajit S.; Ishwar, N.M.; Vanak, Abi TamimIndia, one of the earliest signatories to the World Heritage Convention has five key Protected Areas currently on UNESCO’s World Heritage List - Kaziranga and Manas in Assam, Keoladeo Ghana in Rajasthan, Sundarbans in West Bengal and Nanda Devi in Uttaranchal. All five sites satisfy the natural heritage criterion ‘contain the most important and significant natural habitats for in-situ conservation of biological diversity, including those containing threatened species of outstanding universal value from the point of view of science and conservation’ (iv) and hence are critical to the preservation of globally Significant biodiversity. A strong potential exists to build and to strengthen the constellation of India’s World Heritage Biodiversity (WHB) sites in ways that are exemplary and beneficial for the larger network of PAs in India and abroad. The World Heritage Convention also offers a unique possibility in India to link nature and culture in innovative ways to promote conservation of species like the tiger and the elephant at a nation-wide scale. India presents the greatest challenge anywhere in the world for integrating conservation and development on a grand scale, and success here could have major implications for other parts of the developing world. The WHB sites symbolize humanity's struggle to conserve the earth's precious biological heritage against its own onslaught of nature. Combined with other Protected Areas such as National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries, WHB sites represent the last stand of the nature and the best hope for humanity to conserve our most precious endowment. India represents a remarkable example of successful efforts to conserve significant amounts of biodiversity against all odds. Despite the presence of more than one billion people, India has managed to place 154,826 km? of its land area under its PA network. Considerable amount of biodiversity also occurs in habitats outside protected areas. Furthermore, protected areas in India are among the best-managed reserves in the developing world. The WHB sites and other Protected Areas in India, however, remain highly vulnerable to degradation. As islands, these areas are surrounded by harsh biophysical landscapes and alienated local communities. The PA management is not fully equipped to deal with the growing threats to the parks. The staff is inadequately trained in the enforcement of laws protecting wildlife. In some cases such as Manas in the northeast, field staff is demoralized, having suffered setbacks due to insurgency and social turmoil in the area. Moreover, the field staff have neither access to good communications nor to facilities for health and education for themselves and their families and the basic infrastructure required for the effective management of the PAs are generally lacking. World Heritage Biodiversity Programme for . At higher levels, the park management has been unable to incorporate concepts of conservation science and wildlife management in developing management plans. Since parks represent habitat islands surrounded by dissimilar habitats with high densities of human populations, changes inside the park due to intrinsic and extrinsic factors are inevitable. However, there is no significant effort to adopt a systems approach to anticipate and predict future changes. Continuous assessment and monitoring of biodiversity are almost non-existent. The "island" status of the World Heritage sites also makes them highly vulnerable to anthropogenic pressures. Although these islands are connected to varying degrees with other natural habitats, there have been no comprehensive efforts to examine the feasibility of establishing habitat connectivity in areas containing the WBH sites. Since the areas surrounding sites are even more vulnerable to human pressures than the WBH sites, it is critical to examine the potential of connection among natural areas wherever these sites are located and to bring these areas under greater protection. A more serious problem is the lack of local community involvement in conservation efforts. Local communities in many cases remain hostile to the idea that the parks cannot be used for their traditional purposes of grazing, fishing, or extraction of fuel wood and non-timber forest products. Wild animals from the parks also pose a danger to their livestock, crops and houses, thus exacerbating the conflict. Thus, local communities perceive conservation legislation as a threat to their livelihoods. Although there are economic benefits from conservation, such as ecotourism, such benefits generally do not accrue to local communities. Protected areas also have a low profile. The civil society in general is not aware of the importance and in some cases even the existence of World Heritage sites. Although the protected areas have a tremendous educational potential, educational institutions hardly ever use world heritage sites for educational purposes. A new initiative funded by the United Nations Foundation (UNF) and United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and coordinated by the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India initially covering four existing and ten proposed World Heritage Cluster Sites in India has been initiated to address the key conservation and management issues within a single new framework. This framework referred to as the ‘World Heritage Biodiversity Programme for India (WHBPI)’ has been developed through a collaborative planning process by the, Wildlife Institute of India (WII) and the Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE). The ten year WHBP' will have two phases of four and six years each. Four of the existing five WHB sites in India namely Kaziranga, Keoladeo, Manas and Nanda Devi National Parks have been included in the WHBPI. programme as it is receiving a similar support from the Asian Development Bank under the ‘Sunderbans Biodiversity Project’. The goal of the WHBPI is to strengthen biodiversity conservation in Protected Areas by \ building replicable models at WHB sites that emphasize law enforcement, promote habitat integrity and connectivity, enhance the role of local communities in Protected Area management, improve the professional, social and political profile of the Protected Area management community and its civil society partners. The specific objectives of WHBP! are to: 1) increase the capacity of the staff to address critical needs in conservation, management and protection of the WHB sites, (2) enable the . park staff to incorporate principal concepts of modem science in management plans, (3) increase the connectivity among natural areas in the vicinity of the WHB sites, (4) enhance the stake and the involvement of local communities in the management and the protection of the parks, (5) raise the profile of the WHB sites in civil society, (6) bring about policy and governance reforms so that the management have the flexibility to address contemporary challenges to the conservation of biodiversity in the parks, and (7) conduct surveys at sites that may be designated as additional World Heritage. Biodiversity cluster sites.Item Priority areas for ecological assessment along samruddi corridor, Maharashtra, India: preliminary report(Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 2019) WIIGlobal conservation strategies depend strongly on the creation and strengthening of the protected area network. However, several protected areas are facing new challenges of development In their surroundings leading to habitat f fragmentation and species loss. Roads are essential transport infrastructure to support India's endeavors of fulfilling vital transportation needs across the country. In the last decade, negative impacts of road network has been significant. .Special attention. is therefore required to protect wildlife values like corridors and distribution ranges of wildlife species that overlay the alignment of the expressway. The task, therefore, is to foresee conservation beyond protected areas that undergo modification due to growing infrastructural development, which eventually exerts pressure on protected areas. Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation (MSRDC) has proposed to build a smart green expressway connecting Nagpur to Mumbai. The highway aims at strengthening the rural agriculture sector while enhancing mobility. Although, the proposed alignment does not cross through any existing protected areas nevertheless MSRDC has envisaged developing the road as wildlife friendly infrastructure aiming at conservation outside protected area network. The objective of this report is to assist MSRDC and Government of Maharashtra in addressing ecological concerns at an early stage of planning the highway for safeguarding wildlife values. The preliminary report by the Wildlife Institute of India provides a framework for the protection of wildlife along the proposed alignment (701 km) of Nagpur Mumbai expressway, Maharashtra, India. This report aims at developing a roadmap to assess and evaluate ecological implications of future road development in the landscape with special emphasis on wildlife corridor function. Relevant mitigation measures shall avoid these impacts (direct, indirect and cumulative) of road infrastructure on various wildlife taxa and their habitats within the three landscapes of Maharashtra. The consecutive assessments conducted post this report will provide a strategic mitigation plan to present and minimize impacts of the proposed expressway on ecological habitats and wildlife. The Nagpur-Mumbai expressway is planned to be the first of Its kind project, where mitigation measures for wildlife are planned before? the road is built. This report helps in identifying the Important wildlife habltats that may require further assessment to design appropriate mitigation structuresItem Technical guidelines for habitat and prey restoration in snow leopard landscapes(Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 2017) Rawat, G.S.; Maheshwari, Aishwarya; Sathyakumar, S.Item Ecology of the leopard (Panthera pardus fusca) in Satpura National Park and Bori Wildlife Sanctuary(Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 2007) Edgaonkar, Advait; Chellam, Ravi; Qureshi, Q.The leopard study was undertaken in Satpura Tiger Reserve to study ecology of species in relatively conflict free area. Even basic information on leopard is poor, except for food habits. Leopards have been in the news in popular media in India largely because of instances of human conflict that have occurred in many places. . There is a perception that attacks on humans have increased in the last few years. It is speculated that the probable causes have been decrease in habitat, decline in leopard prey populations or increase in leopard densities close to human populations. Historical data on leopard or prey abundances in any of the conflict areas are lacking, and therefore the reasons given remain speculative. Management of the conflict would be easier if the reasons were reliably known. The study was conducted from 2001 to 2OO7.The objective of this study were a) habitat use and preference, b) prey preference and food habits, c) validate methods for leopard population estimation and d) territoriality and ranging pattern. We achieved all the objectives except ranging pattern due to problems in radio collaring permissions. By the time we got permission it got too late to capture leopards and meaningfully execute this objective and was thus dropped. The vegetation map of the study area was prepared based on remotely sensed data. Thirteen vegetation and landuse classes were identified. The spatial layer for habitat quality, climate and topographic feature were used for occupancy mapping. The prey occupancy maps with topographic data was in turn used to model predator occupancy. Most of the species were 80% correctly classified. The presence only modeling was used to estimate the area occupied by leopard in the 13 districts of south-central Madhya Pradesh. 'Optimal* habitat was 5.2% of the study area, ranging from 0.5 to 8 percent of each district. As an absolute measure it can be said that approximately 11500 sq km of habitat is likely to support leopard populations. The districts with the most optimal habitat are Betul, Hoshangabad and Chhindwara. Leopard as most diverse diet, the frequency of occurrence of prey was ordered as sambar>chital>hare>langur>birds>rodents>porcupine>wild pig>cattle. The diets of the tiger, leopard and dhole overlap to a great extent. The tiger diet overlaps more with that of the leopard than the dhole because of shared inclusion of wild pig, cattle, rodents and birds in their diet. The dhole-leopard overlap is more than the dhole-tiger overlap because the former species-pair hunt in open areas also and both thus take a significant amount of chital, unlike the tiger. Chital comprises about 20 % of leopard's biomass intake. Along with chital, sambar is a preferred prey for the dhole. Tigers seem to prefer large prey species that are more easily available, the mean size of prey being 115 kg. The leopard and dhole tend to take medium sized prey. The leopard being a solitary animal takes a mean prey size of 27 kg, while the pack living dhole takes larger prey of more than 25 kg. The leopard also has the largest range of prey size, taking small prey like hare, birds, rodents and porcupines that dhole did not kill in this study. There has recently been increased attention to the need for reliable estimates of carnivore density in India, but most of the work has been done on tigers scanty information is available for leopards. Camera trapping has been used in conjunction iii with the mark-recapture technique to estimate the densities of species in which individuals can be uniquely identified based on the coat patterns or other external marks. Large felid populations are difficult to estimate because the species are generally low in abundance, nocturnal or crepuscular and have large home ranges. The mean of the four estimates of density in Satpura Tiger Reserve is 8.87 (S.E. 0.9) per 100 sq km. It is recommended that an index of density calculated using the area of the minimum convex polygon (MCP) be used to compare different sites, and half MMDM used to estimate absolute density until further data are available on movement patterns of leopards. The sex ratios are female biased in all areas except Kamti. The average ratio is 1.68 (S.E. 0.38) females per male. For 4 estimates the capture success for males is higher than for females, and in one estimate they are the same. .The larger spatial area model had a higher predictive accuracy than the smaller scale one as quantified by the higher continuous Boyce Index. This is possibly because the Satpura Tiger Reserve has fewer disturbances and is a less heterogeneous area given its smaller size. Given the high density of leopards in the area and requiring large tracts of contiguous habitat they probably move through and live in habitats that are not highly preferred, but are still inhabitable. Very few areas in the Reserve are likely to be completely unsuitable for leopards. Proportion of dhole tracks found per sampling occasion per section declined from 24 percent to 7 percent over the three years. The decline was continuous for the first two years, before recovering in the last year. Mean proportion of leopard tracks were less variable between years, except for second year summer, where they declined drastically. C-scores were higher than expected only in winter for the four large carnivores, which suggests that competitive structuring and subtle patterns of avoidance, if present, are more likely to break down in summer. In summer habitat selection for all carnivores is likely to be more influenced by the presence of water and shade than by the presence of competitors. The understanding how these carnivore species coexist could be important in managing large carnivores in areas where more than one species is found in sympatry. Interspecific competition is a major process in the structuring of many communities and seems that resource partitioning along a combination of temporal, spatial and dietary axes has structured the large carnivore community.Item Assessent of prey populations for lion re-introduction in Kuno wildlife sanctuary, Central India(Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 2005) Johnsingh, A.J.T.; Qureshi, Q.; Goyal, S.P.Realizing that it is unwise to keep the only free-ranging population of Asiatic lions (Panthera leo persica) in one location (Gir forests), the Government of India made an effort to establish the second population in Chandraprabha Wildlife Sanctuary (WLS, 96 km2), Uttar Pradesh, in 1957. This effort, for various reasons, did not succeed. In 1993-94, with the aim of finding a second home for the lions, a team from Wildlife Institute of India (WI!) surveyed three wildlife habitats in the states of Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh. Among the three, Kuno WLS (345 km2) was identified as the most suitable site. With assistance from the Government of India, a twenty-year project was initiated in 1995, to establish a disturbance-free habitat here for reintroducing lions. Between 1996 and 200 I, twenty-four villages, with about 1547 families, have been translocated from the Sanctuary by the Madhya Pradesh Forest Department. The Madhya Pradesh Government has also demarcated a 1280 km2 Kuno Wildlife Division, encompassing the Sironi, Agra and Morawan forest ranges around the Sanctuary. In order to assess whether the Sanctuary has sufficient wild prey base, the WII was requested to asses the availability of prey in early 2005. With the assistance of34 forest staff 17 transects totaling 461 km were surveyed over an area of 280 km2 The density of catchable wild prey (chital, sam bar, nilgai, wild pig) by lions was 13 animals!km2. There are about 2500 cattle, left behind by the translocated people which are considered to be the buffer prey for lions to tide over the likely problem of drought periodically killing wild ungulates. With the implementation of the recommendations such as the control of poaching, grassland management, building rubble wall around the Division and water augmentation, we predict a substantial rise (ca.20 animals!km2) in the wild prey base for lions by end of2007. This prey density would be able to support the first batch of five lions (three females and two males) to be reintroduced in the beginning of 2008. Even if all the three females raise cubs, there will be sufficient wild prey by the end of 2009 to support them. Meanwhile efforts should be made to implement all the recommendations given in this report with immediate effect and get the whole hearted support of Gujrat Government to make this historic venture a success.Item Development of Desert National Park as biosphere reserve(Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun and BNHS, 2006) Kalra, M.; Rahmani, A.R.; Choudhury, B.C.; Qureshi, Q.The Biosphere Reserve Programme aims to conserve biological diversity, including the genetic diversity of cultivated crops, and domesticated and wild animals. It also aims to study the natural ecosystems and comparative studies on man-modified ecosystems. In order to conserve overall biological diversity of Earth, it would be desirable to constitute at least one or two biosphere reserves in each of the biogeographic provinces. More than 100 nations have already set apart 482 such reserves, since the UNESCO's Man and the Biosphere (MAB) programme was initiated in 1974. The hot desert in north-western region is a unique and the only habitat of its type in the Indian subcontinent. The Ministry of Environment and Forests constituted a working group in 1988 to draw a project document on the Thar Desert Biosphere Reserve (Anon. 1988). The objective of the Biosphere Reserve (BR) was oriented in such a way that BRs were wtits wherein the biological, socio-economic and cultural elements are integrated together. The main emphasis of this concept is the need for conserving ecosystem capable of being restored to natural condition. In this study we identified 16 unprotected areas in Bikaner, Jodhpur, Jaisalmer, Barmer, Nagur, Jalor and Sanchor districts with fairly large areas ranging from 5-7,091 km'. Each area supports mammals as well as several species of plants. These areas represent excellent animal-plant communities and traditional landuse practices, which together support a large number of microorganisms, small grasses and perennial herbs, which constitute the Thar ecosystem. The main emphasis of developing a Biosphere Reserve was given to Desert National Park (DNP). Vegetation as well as boundary mapping of DNP was done to visualize the land use/cover in and around it. All the villages in and around the Park were surveyed and mapped on GIS domain. This region includes the largest known populations of endangered species such as the Great Indian Bustard Ardeotis nigriceps, and the Chinkara Gazella bennetti and many lesser-known groups of plants and animals. The total area of propsed biosphere reserve is around 4,648 km' of which 76.36 km' will be as core zone, excluding four new areas, which are marked on the map, and 1,486 km2 transition zone. The existing area of the DNP is 3,162 km' which needs to be further extended upto 5 km from the park boundary. This extra (1,486 km') area will be use as a transition zone. In order to protect and enhance the biodiversity and cultural diversity of the Thar Desert, we also propose the concept of Greater Thar Desert (Marusthali) Biosphere Reserve, which should inelude the ON!>, Tal Chhaper, Diyatra and other biodiversity rich areas. We recommend that in the Greater Thar Desert (Marusthali) Biosphere Reserve, Community Conservation Areas (e.g. Guda-Vishnonian, Dhawa-Doli, Khichan etc.) and Conservation Reserves (e.g. Jakharda) should also be includedItem Ecological studies in Sariska tiger reserve, Rajasthan(Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 2009) Sankar, K.; Qureshi, Q.; Mondal, Krishnendu; Worah, T.; Srivastava, S.; Gupta, S.; Basu, S.The objectives of study are : 1. To address the distribution and status of tigers and co-predators. 2. To address the distribution and status of prey species. 3. To prepare vegetation and land cover map of Sariska TR. 4. To study the socio economic profile and resource dependency of local people in the notified national park area and 5. To identify potential areas for 'source' population and areas warranting restorative action for corridor connectivity to facilitate gene flow.Item Mapping of the protected area (PA) and surrounding areas in Pench Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh(Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 2000) Sankar, K.; Qureshi, Q.; Mathur, V.B.; Mukherjee, S.K.; Areendran, G.; Pasha, M.K.S.In this study the task included the preparation of baseline maps of Pench tiger reserve and surrounding areas consisting of features relevant to PA management and ecodevelopment activities. The maps were digitized and incorporated in Geographical Information System (GIS) domain. As part of assignment the spatial database developed for the Pench tiger reserve has been installed in the PTR office at Seoni.Item Ecology of tigers in Pench Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra(Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 2013) Sankar, K.; Qureshi, Q.; Jhala, Y.V.; Gopal, R.; Majumdar, Aniruddha; Basu, S.The present study aimed to map land use/land cover patterns and to assess spatial structure and configuration of landscape; structure and composition of vegetation types in landscape; and varies ecological aspects of tiger (Panthera tigris) in a tropical deciduous forest of Central India from 2005 to 2013. Prey species availability was estimated using line transect method in an intensive study areas of 410 sq km between January 2007 and June 2012.Item Ecology and Management of swamp deer (Cervus duvauceli duvauceli) in Dudhwa Tiger Reserve, U.P. India(Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 1995) Qureshi, Q.; Sawarkar, V.B.; Mathur, P.K.